This a blog for Mr. James Cook's eleventh grade honors English class at Gloucester (MA) High School. Remember what Northrup Frye writes in _Fearful Symmetry_, "No one can begin to think straight unless [she or] he has a passionate desire to think and an intense joy in thinking."

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Lord of the Flies Note-Taking and Prompts (the new prompt is at the bottom)

Lord of the Flies Review for Honors 11 (the new prompt is at the bottom in bold text)

Things to think about and pay attention to while reading Lord of the Flies

Our questions:

Will the boys survive? How?

How will they make decisions? Will they form a government? What causes or prevents disagreements?

What causes violence? What role does fear play? Does violence lurk with in us or is it learned?

Our O’Maley Experiment:

Imagine you are back in the middle school. The teachers leave. You don’t know why. Then you are sealed inside the middle school with your peers and no adults. What would happen?

How motifs (how they are described, how they are used, etc.) are significant literally and symbolically in Lord of the Flies:

The appearance of the island (the scar, the weather, etc.); the appearance of the boys (uniforms, hair, faces, etc.); the shell/conch; rocks; the glasses; the fire; the pig/boar; the “beast”

How characters (what they look like, say, and do; what others say about them and do to them) are significant literally and symbolically in Lord of the Flies:

Ralph, Piggy, Jack, Simon, Roger (other member of the choir), Sam and Eric (other older boys not in the choir), the littluns

How the titles of the chapters are significant literally and symbolically in Lord of the Flies.

(Thoughtful) Reading Checks

1. The Sound of the Shell

Compare and contrast the first chapter of Lord of the Flies with your thoughts about “The O’Maley Experiment”.

2. Fire on the Mountain

Explain the significance of the title of chapter two. Show that you have understood the relationship between the chapter and the title both literally and allegorically.

3. Huts on the Beach

Explain the literal and symbolic significance of the chapter’s title.

Explain the literal and symbolic significance of one of the characters in the chapter.

Explain the literal and symbolic significance of one of the motifs in the chapter.

4. Painted Faces and Long Hair

Write and respond to your own open-response question. Your question could relate to the O’Maley Experiment, the essential questions, the character you were assigned, the motif you were assigned, the chapter titles, or something else of significance. Your response should demonstrate both that you have understood what you have read and that you have thought about its significance to the work as a whole.

5. Beast from Water

Write and respond to your own open-response question. Your question could relate to the O’Maley Experiment, the essential questions, the character you were assigned, the motif you were assigned, the chapter titles, or something else of significance. Your response should demonstrate both that you have understood what you have read and that you have thought about its significance to the work as a whole.

6. “Beast from Air” and “Shadows and Tall Trees”

Write for ten minutes from the point of view of the character you were assigned. What have you seen over the past two chapters? What do you think about what has happened?

7. “Gift for the Darkness,” “A View to a Death,” “The Shell and the Glasses,” “Castle Rock,” “Cry of the Hunters”

Imagine that you are William Golding. From his point of view write a letter to the students of Gloucester High School explaining how a character and a motif (the ones you have been assigned) contribute to the meaning of the the novel, especially in the last five chapters. (You could write two letters one about the motif and one about the character, or you could weave the two together.)

While explaining how you, as the author, have used the character and the motif, cite at least three specific places where you, as Golding, use the character and three specific places where you, as Golding, use the motif. Make sure you explain how the parts -- the particular uses of the character & motif -- contribute to the novel as a whole.

(Tom asked the question, should we focus on the character's/motif's use overall or on specific scenes? I answered by saying you should have some big ideas about the character's & the motif's use overall and you should be able to support the big ideas with specific examples. Likewise you should be able to use the specific appearances of the character & motif to help you generate big ideas about how the character & motif contribute to the overall meaning.)

When thinking about Golding's point of view and Golding’s purpose in constructing the novel, consider some things Golding has written about the novel:

“The theme (of Lord of the Flies) is an attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature. The moral is that the shape of society must depend on the ethical mature of the individual and not on any political system however apparently logical or respectable.”

“I believe that man suffers from an appalling ignorance of his own nature.”

Also perhaps consider William Golding's life. The following is an excerpt from the Nobel Prize website. (Golding won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1983.)

"Taught at Bishop Wordsworth's School, Salisbury. Joined the Royal Navy in 1940 and spent six years afloat, except for seven months in New York and six months helping Lord Cherwell at the Naval Research Establishment. He saw action against battleships (at the sinking of the Bismarck), submarines and aircraft. Finished as Lieutenant in command of a rocket ship. He was present off the French coast for the D-Day invasion, and later at the island of Walcheren. After the war he returned to teaching [until 1962], and began to write again. Lord of the Flies, his first novel, was published in 1954."

And for more of Golding's views you'll find his Nobel Lecture here.

Your letter(s) should be 600 words or so and must be posted in the comment box by pumpkin time Friday, December 18.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Monster Books: First Comments

* Post responses in the comment box. (Remember to compose in a word processing file. Then copy and paste your work into the comment box.)
* Use your first name and last initial (for example James C.)
* Write the title and author of your book (for example Frankenstein by Mary Shelley).
* Write your response.

Respond to the author's portrayal of monsters (and/or monstrousness) in the novel you are reading. Your response should be 300+ words and must be received before pumpkin time (midnight) Monday. The questions below may help you generate a thoughtful response.


Who is the monster or who are the monsters in the book?
How do you know? What makes the character a monster? Physical deformity or difference? Inhuman or inhumane behavior? Both? Something else? What is the relationship between physical monstrousness and moral monstrousness in your book? (Some possibilities: Does physical monstrosity mask moral beauty? Does physical monstrosity lead to alienation which leads to monstrous moral choices? Etc.)

What seems to be the cause of the monstrous behavior in your book?
(Is it in the monster’s nature as with the Grendel of Beowulf? Is it chosen by the monster as a response to radical alienation and rejection as with the Grendel of Grendel? Is it learned by the monster? Is it taught to the monster?

What seems to be the author’s purpose in presenting a monster (and/or monstrous behavior) in the novel? What is the author trying to show about human beings and the human condition?

Grading: Your responses should show that you have read the first 50 to 100 pages of your book and that you understand how the book relates to monsters and monstrousness.

An advanced response, which shows a command of "monster" concepts and appropriate, precise, thorough supporting evidence, will receive an A.

A proficient responses, which offers plausible interpretations of monstrousness with specific support and no major omissions or errors, will receive a B.

A limited response, which offers partial interpretations of monstrousness with some specific, accurate, appropriate support, will receive a C.

A response, which address the prompt but which offer little to no support and which demonstrate little to no understanding of how the author uses monsters in significant ways, will receive a D or F.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Read Another Monster Book

Monstrous Humanity? Monstrous Culture? Monstrous Nature?
Choose a book from this list & post your choice in the comment box.
Read the book.
While you’re reading write down notes and questions, especially concerning the monsters and the themes related to monstrousness.

Who is the monster or who are the monsters in the book? How do you know? What makes the character a monster? Physical deformity or difference? Inhuman or inhumane behavior? Both? Something else? What is the relationship between physical monstrousness and moral monstrousness in your book? (Some possibilities: Does physical monstrosity mask moral beauty? Does physical monstrosity lead to alienation which leads to monstrous moral choices? Etc.)

What seems to be the cause of the monstrous behavior in your book? (Is it in the monster’s nature as with the Grendel of Beowulf? Is it chosen by the monster as a response to radical alienation and rejection as with the Grendel of Grendel? Is it learned by the monster? Is it taught to the monster?

What seems to be the author’s purpose in portraying a literal monster (or monstrous behavior)? What is the author trying to show about human beings and the human condition?

(l=literal monster: a not-quite-human but human-like beast of some sort or a significantly physically deformed human)
(f=figurative monster: a human who behaves monstrously)

Brief Interviews with Hideous Men, (1999) by David Foster Wallace (f)

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, (1886) by Robert Louis Stevenson (l?/f?)

Metamorphosis, (1915) by Franz Kafka (l)

Frankenstein, (1818) by Mary Shelley (l)

Freddy’s Book
, (1980) by John Gardner (f/l)

The Hunchback of Notre Dame, (1831) by Victor Hugo (l)

In Cold Blood
, (1965) by Truman Capote (f)

Native Son, (1940) by Richard Wright (f)

The Picture of Dorian Gray, (1890) by Oscar Wilde (f/l)

The Tempest
, (1610-11) by William Shakespeare (l)

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Post-Beowulf Readings

Reading choices:
"The Wanderer" (trans. Raffel) "Beowulf" (Wilbur), Beowulf (Sagoff), Gilgamesh (Mason), I Samuel, Chapters 16-18 [David and Goliath], "A Gathering of Heroes" (Alan-Williams)

Open Response Questions:
1. What does the text suggest about heroes and heroism?
2. What does the text suggest about monsters and monstrousness?
3. How is the narrative point of view significant in the text?

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Jane Eyre Blogging

Here are links to last year's Jane Eyre blog comments. I think you'll find it helpful to take a look. I invite you to respond explicitly to points made by last year's class. (Make sure you give credit where credit is due.)

Jane Eyre chapters 1-16
Jane Eyre chapters 17-26
Jane Eyre chapters 27-38

& here you'll find commentary by my friend Mr. Gallagher's Malden High AP students about the end of Jane Eyre. (You'll notice we talked about many of the same issues today in class. Notice how many of them have taken ideas and have developed them.)

The student-led and teacher-led in class discussions provide opportunities for you to display your knowledge of the particulars of the text (what is written and how it is written) and to speculate about what it means and why that meaning is significant. In other words, offer assertive, insightful interpretations of what you have read and support your interpretations with evidence from the text. That's what AP lit is all about.

I then evaluate whether you've met expectations by showing a reasonable, plausible understanding of the text, have exceeded expectations by showing a convincingly thorough and thoroughly convincing understanding of the text, have fallen short of expectations by offering a limited or partial understanding of the text, or have show little to no understanding of the text.

As I've started to look over my discussion notes many of you have offered limited understanding or no understanding during class discussion. Blog!

Beowulf (trans. Raffel) section 1-18

In class (Monday, September 28) we got a summary from Kevin Hurd. Then before we could add much to his summary we plunged deeply into a discussion of the relationship (as presented in the text) between the Christian God, Beowulf, and Grendel. Several of you did some excellent digging for direct quotations. This is the kind of conversation -- using our interpretive skills in response to the text -- that I hope we keep having.

We'll continue the discussion of this section of Beowulf on Tuesday. You should write comments for whatever you know, think, and feel but were unable to say during class.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Welcome!

E-block English with Mr. James Cook, this is your blog.

Below you will find posts and comments from previous honors 11 classes. Check 'em out if you're interested. They'll give you an idea of what's to come.

best wishes,
Mr. Cook